Last night, on January 8th of 2017, my younger brother Ethan Dizon took his life. He was only fourteen, and none of us knew that he had suicidal thoughts or signs of depression. This is the second suicide to happen in a matter of months at St Thomas More Catholic Junior High School, with the latter taking place around late October to early November.
My name is Chloe Dizon, and I had also attended St. Thomas More Catholic Junior High, eventually attaining my Junior High Diploma in 2015, As a young teen there, I have witnessed discrimination among the students, and as a result I was diagnosed with depression at the age of fifteen. No child should ever have to experience what I had to go through, and to have my brother lose the battle that I have been fighting for the past two years has angered me to take action.
I ask the Edmonton Catholic School District and the City of Edmonton to open an investigation into St. Thomas More Catholic Junior High, to not only expose the harsh bullying environment and the elitist attitude found in the Sports Academy but also the clear favoritism towards major student athletes and the Sports Academy.
St. Thomas More School is renowned for their esteemed Sports Academies, attracting many students outside their catchment zone. What is not known about St. Thomas More however, is the rampant bullying, often unchecked by the school administration. According to the Canadian Health Institute, Canada has the 9th highest rate of bullying found in thirteen year olds, and 1 in 3 Canadian adolescents have experienced bullying in their lifetime. THIS IS A NUMBER THAT NEEDS TO CHANGE.
Disclaimer: Even if the motive was something other than bullying, these statistics need to change. Lets swear together, that we will NEVER LET THIS HAPPEN AGAIN.
I don't know a world without you, my younger brother. Remember the times when we were in Mexico and we were wrestling in the pool? Or the time when me and you would walk around Disneyland without Mom and Dad, trying to get Single Rider Passes for rides so we could go on all the rides together before closing?
Ethan, I'll miss you every day, and I love you. I may seem like the "Big Bad Sister" at times, but I never, EVER, intended to hurt you. You were my little brother and I love you so, so much.
Rest In Peace little brother, heaven has another angel,
This petition will be delivered to:
ECSD Superintendent Joan Carr
ECSD Trustee Patricia
ECSD Trustee Patricia Grell
9 more decision makers...
FEB 1, 2017 — Hello everyone,
I am just waiting for the next board meeting, or the school board to call me for further inquiries. But for now, I will be focusing more of my energy in school.
When folks are paid to write they are constrained. Citizens need to go beyond journalist chatter and GOA spin to the facts. What are the facts? How do the facts support the chatter and spin?
It's best to understand that there is secrecy in the government simply because government does not want to shake public confidence in their work. This is understandable but the facts still need to be provided to citizens.
Why? I guess the facts will indicate to us if the public confidence in government performance is warranted or not.
When journalists join the 'dark side': Andrew MacDougall
Should there be a revolving door between government and the people who scrutinize it?
By Andrew MacDougall, for CBC News Posted: Mar 01, 2017 5:00 AM ET Last Updated: Mar 01, 2017 5:00 AM ET
Do Liberal and Conservative governments full of journalists mean anything nefarious? Or are critics just being petty? (Sean Kilpatrick/Canadian Press)
About The Author
Andrew MacDougall is a Canadian-British national based in London who writes about politics and current affairs. He was previously director of communications for former Canadian prime minister Stephen Harper.
It's so dark, journalists are joining the very place on which they are paid to throw shade: the government.
The latest move to the "dark" side: Postmedia columnist Michael Den Tandt, who announced he was leaving his post on February 10, only to join Team Trudeau a couple of weeks later to pen (more) words about Canada-U.S. relations.
It's been a steady stream of late out of the Parliamentary Press Gallery. Den Tandt joins former Postmedia stablemate Mark Kennedy, Canadian Press alum Bruce Cheadle, ex-CTV editor David Taylor (full disclosure: Taylor's role involved assigning my partner), and two former CBC radio reporters, James Cudmore and James Fitz-Morris, all of whom have joined the Trudeau government.
Is it right?
These are smart folks and government should, in theory, be better for their service. They were good journalists, and they know government well.
But is it right? Should there be a revolving door between government and the people who scrutinize it?
It's a question I imagine Conservative leadership contenders will be asking in their latest fundraising missives. What more proof does one need that the Media Party exists, and that it wears red?
Of course, Conservatives weren't quite so fussy when they were the ones welcoming the press into government.
Liberal partisans — along with defensive media types — have been quick to point out that Stephen Harper's government appointed its share of ex-journalists. And indeed, they did. I worked for two of them: John Williamson (National Post) and Angelo Persichilli (Corriere Canadese / Toronto Star) both served stints as Harper's director of communications. And our speechwriting team during my time there included former journalists Nigel Hannaford and Scott Anderson (with Derek Shelly joining later), and historian/journalist/walking Canadian political encyclopedia Art Milnes.
And our government was better for it. Well, in most cases. But I can honestly say these folks were hired despite being journalists, not because of it, although I realize this is a distinction without a difference.
So, do Liberal and Conservative governments full of journalists mean anything nefarious? Or are critics just being petty? After all, don't journalists need to put food on their families' tables? And how could they cover a place like Ottawa without, eventually, wanting to try out their own ideas?
Journalists aren't taking the work because it's easy. It's damn hard. (The Canadian Press/Adrian Wyld)
Indeed, why wouldn't someone like Mark Kennedy want to join PMO to write about electoral reform? Ok, fine, let's forget that example. Why wouldn't someone like Den Tandt want to put their shoulder to the wheel on Canada-U.S. relations at a time when so much is at stake? Why wouldn't James Cudmore, a man who covered the military for years, want to try his hand at procurement policy? Right, let's scrap that example too.
The point being, journalists aren't taking the work because it's easy. It's damn hard. And there's no job security. But there's arguably more than the alternative. Ask yourself, which of government and journalism has the brighter future? If not join now — when journalists might get summarily cut or canned by their media employers — then when? Having gone the other way, I can tell you I'm not writing about any of this because it pays the bills. I just like to write. Parliamentary journalists like government.
And yet, I can't dismiss the conspiracy-minded. Not completely. What's happening now with the Parliamentary Press Gallery could be a tactic from the Prime Minister's Office. There's a reason Trudeau aides Kate Purchase and Gerry Butts made a point of tweeting out Den Tandt's arrival.
Plucking reporters from the press gallery at this fevered moment in the Conservative leadership race could very well boost a "populist" like Kellie Leitch. And it will definitely feed Conservative/conservative paranoia about the press. Both of these outcomes would be helpful for Trudeau come 2019.
But let's hope it's not a tactic, or a strategy. Especially because this migration of journalists will inflict more long-term pain on the industry they've chosen to abandon. Government and the press are both suffering from low trust. Upping the clubbiness between them will do nothing to boost either figure. Indeed, it will send them the other way.
The legitimate anger feeding populism needs a productive and safe outlet, whether that's through representation by political parties or advocacy via the press. With fewer bodies reporting on government, and more bodies in it, there's less chance government will behave properly, or be held to account.
If citizens outside of the Ottawa bubble get the impression that neither the press or the politicians are on their side, the urge to tune it all out or knock it all down will continue to grow.
Journalists are paid and they follow who pays them. So really all journalists have to message according to their employers whether they are private businesses or public parties like government or health authorities.
Citizens understand that no matter who is writing press for government that most of what government produces is positive spin and as such citizen have to ask good questions of government to get to the real facts of performance and deliverables.
Selective release of information is an ongoing problem in Alberta. I have been asking the government of Alberta for example why it has not provided me the audits that I have requested on a continuing care facility in Alberta. I have not been given any answers to the refusal to release the 2014 Alberta Health Quality audit or the 2014 AHS respiratory review. When non-transparency in the form of selective responses is combined with spin from journalists in government we are in real trouble.
Even the release of fatality inquiry data on prisoners who have died in contact with government is taking months to release. Why? This is information on deceased citizens with no privacy implications and yet there is chatter that "historical" reports will take time. I believe citizens must continue to do their jobs of holding government accountable over decades in order to get government to give us the facts of their work in a timely and transparent manner. We can't depend on journalists. We have to do the work of good citizenship without them.« less